Legal Opinion

Rockford Life Insurance v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1934No. 722PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

This case involves the validity of a deficiency assessment of 1929 income taxes made under the Revenue Act of 1928. Section 202 defines gross income to be that re ceived from interest, dividends and rents. Section 203 (a) defines net income to be the gross less specified deductions including (5) “ investment expenses,” (6) “ Taxes and other expenses paid during, the taxable year exclusively upon or with respect to the real estate owned by the company . . .” and (7) “A reasonable allowance for the exhaustion, wear and tear of property, including a reasonable allowance for obsolescence.”…

2Cited by40 opinions

  1. Zuanich v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  2. Pink v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  4. Helvering v. Manhattan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  5. State Mutual Life Assurance Company of Worcester v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API