Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lopez-Mendoza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1983No. Nos. 79-7673, 80-7189Published

1Dissent

ALARCON, Circuit Judge, with whom EUGENE A. WRIGHT, WALLACE and POOLE, Circuit Judges,

join dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

Today the majority has extended the exclusionary rule to the suppression of oral statements in civil deportation proceedings. None of the cases relied upon by the majority support this radical departure from existing law.

It is equally remarkable that the majority has chosen this drastic example of judicial law making at a time when the United States Supreme Court has raised questions as to whether:

the rule requiring the exclusion at a criminal trial of evidence obtained…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API