Legal Opinion

Joseph D. Murphy v. State of Ohio

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 27, 2001No. 00-4558PublishedCited by 759 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

2Per curiam

Petitioner-appellant Joseph D. Murphy, an Ohio death row inmate, has filed an application for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, seeking permission to appeal from the district court’s decision denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In its order denying Murphy habeas relief, the district court also denied Murphy a COA and certified that an appeal could not be taken in good faith. For the reasons that follow, we VACATE the district court’s denial of a COA and REMAND the case for reconsideration of each claim raised by Murphy in…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sidney Porterfield v. Ricky Bell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

4Cited by759 opinions

  1. Robert Jinx Castro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Murphy v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Haynes v. QuartermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Bonnell v. MitchelDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  5. Grays v. LaflerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008

754 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API