Legal Opinion

Grays v. Lafler

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided November 25, 2008No. Case 1:08-cv-684PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Promptly after the filing of a petition for habeas corpus, the Court must undertake a preliminary review of the petition to determine whether “it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; see 28 U.S.C. § 2243. If so, the petition must be summarily dismissed. Rule 4; see Allen v. Perini, 424 F.2d 134, 141 (6th Cir. 1970)…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Allen v. SwingDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
  2. BELL v. MacauleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  3. Babcock 795986 v. RewertsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
  4. Bell 399964 v. BurgessDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
  5. Caradine v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API