Legal Opinion
Hill v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1985No. 84-2503PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Appellants appeal from the district court’s order denying them attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(b) and 2412(d). We affirm.
FACTS
The factual background of the administrative and court litigation in this matter is set forth in Hill v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 714 F.2d 1470 (9th *1039Cir.1983), aff'g Lesbian/Gay Freedom Day Committee, 541 F.Supp. 569 (N.D.Cal.1982). A brief restatement follows.
The Immigration and Nationality Act (the “Act”) provides that certain classes of aliens shall be ineligible to receive visas and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Boutilier v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- J.H. McQuiston v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army, United States Army Missile CommandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Foster v. TourtellotteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hill v. United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Marin Town CenterDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992