Legal Opinion

People v. Hicks

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 2005PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was charged with rape in the first degree and related crimes stemming from a sexual assault perpetrated against a female victim. During deliberations, the trial judge received a note from the jury foreperson asking to speak to the judge. When questioned in court, the foreperson explained that the jury had a concern that one of its members “should be excused from the jury for the simple fact that she said, on an occasion she was forced—forcibly raped by her boyfriend or [fiancé] at the time.”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BufordNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. SalemiNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. People v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. People v. TorresNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Whitley v. ErcoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. People v. KuzdzalNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. People v. PaigeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. The People v. Elliot ParrillaNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. People v. ColterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API