People v. Morris
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. We agree with the Appellate Division in its memorandum for reversal that the summation by the prosecutor was improper and that the history portion of the autopsy report should not have been excluded. These two errors taken together constituted reversible error which required reversal of the conviction and a new trial.
However, we cannot adopt the Appellate Division’s view that the trial court erred in its instruction to the jury on circumstantial evidence. While we would prefer that the instruction on circumstantial evidence state that the hypothesis of guilt should flow naturally…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BenzingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. CleagueNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. BorreroNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. LaganaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. SanchezNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Franza v. StinsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.