Legal Opinion

Baty v. MacKen Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1956Published

1Opinion of the Court

206 Or. 285 (1956)

292 P.2d 489

BATY ET AL

v.

MACKEN ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued December 8, 1955.

Affirmed January 25, 1956.

Brazier C. Small, of Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Osterman & Williams, of Salem.

R.W. Pickell, of Salem, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and TOOZE, LUSK and BRAND, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

TOOZE, J.

This action was brought by William H. Baty and Motors Insurance Corporation, as plaintiffs, against J.K. Macken and Dorothy Macken, as defendants, to recover for property damage to and loss of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Valdin v. HolteenOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Aune v. Oregon Trunk RailwayOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Baty v. MacKen Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API