Legal Opinion

Grohs v. Yatauro

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 20, 2013No. Civ. No. 2:12-00905 (KM)(MCA)PublishedCited by 212 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KEVIN McNULTY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the motion of the Defendants, Meg Yatauro and Gary M. Lanigan, to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and on grounds of sovereign and qualified immunity. Also before the Court is a motion for a preliminary injunction filed by the Plaintiff, Steven Grohs. For the reasons discussed below, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

The Plaintiff, Steven Grohs, is a civilly…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by212 opinions

  1. 9 ROSA PARKS LLC v. SAMKOGHDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  2. AHSAN ASHFAQ v. AROCHODistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
  3. ANDERSON v. WELLS FARGO BANKDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  4. ANYAEGBUNAM v. EXPERIAN, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  5. ANYAEGBUNAM v. EXPERIAN, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API