Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Telgian Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 31, 2016No. 14-CV-3422 (PKC)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs Dennis Ramos, Ed Rodriguez, Edward Kralick, and Daniel Emerson1 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this action to recover, on behalf of themselves individually and all similarly situated individuals, unpaid overtime compensation from Defendant Telgian Corporation (“Defendant” or “Telgian”), under Sections 207 and 216 of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 207, 216(b), and, individually, unpaid overtime and spread-of-hours compensation under the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), NYLL § 663, and the New York…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API