Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Dalferes

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1934No. 1288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIOTT, Judge.

Frank K. Hopkins claims $125 of Maximilian D. Dalferes as a quantum meruit for work done in abstracting certain tax titles.

Dalferes denies owing anything; denies that he authorized plaintiff to do the work on account of which payment is claimed; and prays that his demand be rejected.

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff as prayed for.

Defendant has appealed.

The issue between the parties as to whether or not Dalferes authorized Hopkins to do the work presents a serious question. The abstract work done has been brought up and has received our consideration in connection…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toca v. RojasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. Rubenstein v. FilesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Crescent City Ice Co. v. ErmannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bishop v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Gully v. Mut. L. Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Rather v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Banking Commission v. Prudential Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Bryant v. SevierMississippi Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API