Alexander's Land Co. v. M & M & K Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
This dispute arose out of the attempted exercise of an option to purchase real property where a restaurant is situated. The trial court denied the buyer’s request for specific performance of the option. The Court of Appeals held the buyer was entitled to specific performance, finding that, except for failing to meet a condition precedent, the buyer had properly exercised the option and thus the seller should have given the buyer notice of default and a right to cure. Alexander’s Land Co. v. M & M & K Corp., Op. No.2007-UP-364 (S.C. Ct.App. filed Aug. 29, 2007). We granted a petition for a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Auto Owners Insurance v. RollisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- McGill v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Ingram v. Kasey's AssociatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Wood v. Roy Lapidus, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Milliken & Co. v. MorinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Gecy v. S.C. Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- T-Zone Health Inc v. SouthStar Capital LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023