Legal Opinion

Hanover State Bank v. Henke

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 6, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the District Court of Garfield, County; before . James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Pancoast, J.:

This was an action upon a promissory note, brought originally before a justice of the peace and appealed to the district court. Trial was by jury, resulting in each instance in a verdict for defendants, and from an order overruling a motion for new trial, plaintiff in error has appealed.

The only assignments of error to which our attention is directed are such that a consideration thereof necessarily in volves an examination of the evidence taken on the trial below.

The rule is so well established in this Territory as to need no citation of authorities, that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frame v. RyelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  2. Exendine v. GoldstineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kiowa County Bank v. Horart Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Tingley v. TingleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Ashcraft v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API