Daniel Vargas v. MLEM Properties Incorporated

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Daniel Vargas, No. CV-25-03047-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 MLEM Properties Incorporated, 13 Defendant. 14 15 The Court now considers Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 6.) It is fully 16 briefed. The Motion will be granted as follows. 17 I. 18 A motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) for 19 failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted “tests the legal sufficiency of a 20 claim.” Navarro v. Block, 250 F.3d 729, 732 (9th Cir. 2001). A court may dismiss…