Legal Opinion
Freundt v. Com. Dept. of Transp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 2005No. 181 MAP 2002PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CAPPY.
The question presented in this appeal is whether the suspension of driving privileges provision at 75 Pa.C.S. § 1532(c) requires the imposition of separate suspensions for each individual violation of specified drug offenses in the Crimes Code, or a single suspension for a first criminal episode. We find that this provision requires the imposition of a single suspension for a first criminal episode. For the following reasons, therefore, we affirm the Commonwealth Court’s Order.
The background information relevant to the disposition of this appeal is that Appellee,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. BavusaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. PerrusoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Pocono Manor Investors, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Drabic v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- White Deer Township v. NappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Trib Total Media, Inc. v. Highlands School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.