Legal Opinion

Ray Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1959No. Appeal, No. 79PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Claimant has appealed from the order of the board denying Unemployment Compensation benefits. For 2% years she had worked as cashier in the “Persian Room”, a cocktail lounge, in the Penn-Sherwood Hotel in Philadelphia. Operation of the lounge was discontinued and the Persian Room was closed on February 15, 1958. Claimant then was offered a job as food checker in the kitchen, a position which she had filled while the cocktail lounge was closed for the summer season of 1957. She refused the transfer on the ground that “it was too hot in the'kitchen”; •

*106The board concluded that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Allen Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Kaminski Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Johnson Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Wescoe Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Medwick v. Bd. of Review, Div. Empl. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Pierce Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Sollecito v. Hollywood Lincoln Mercury, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API