Legal Opinion

In re Dayville Woolen Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1902No. 780PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On question certified by referee.

1Opinion of the Court

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

In this case the referee certifies certain ’questions to me for opinion and action thereon. It appears that at the meeting for the proof of claims and election of a trustee, and after the claims had been approved and the referee was proceeding to take the vote for trustee, ’ Attorney Shipman, for certain creditors, asked Attorney Perkins, counsel for a majority of the creditors, as to whether or not any of the claims attempted to be voted by said Perkins had been assigned to any person or corporation in the interest of the bankrupt. Counsel refused to answer this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Falter v. ReinhardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  2. In re RekersdresDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1901
  3. In re HenschelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1901
  4. In re HoughtonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re SittingDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1910
  2. In re EastlackDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1906
  3. In re Arti-Stain Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1914
  4. In re Capital Security Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API