Legal Opinion

State v. Wearing

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 7, 2006No. AC 27018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVINE, J.

The defendant, Edward Wearing, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, of interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a. On appeal, the defendant raises several claims, all premised on his contention that probable cause to make the arrest is an element of the crime. The defendant argues that because the state failed to prove that the police officer who arrested him had probable cause to do so, there was insufficient evidence by which the jury could find him guilty. Because probable cause to arrest is not an element…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GallagherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. State v. BrocuglioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. State v. SanchezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. State v. BriggsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LamantiaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. State v. WaltersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Moyher v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. State v. WearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. State v. WearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API