Legal Opinion

State v. Lamantia

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 8, 2018No. AC40157PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiPENTIMA, C.J.

*649 *516 The defendant, Jasmine Lamantia, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after *650 a jury trial, of interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a and tampering with a witness in violation of General Statutes § 53a-151. On appeal, the defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction for these offenses. We agree with the defendant with respect to the interfering with an officer count, but disagree as to the tampering with a witness count. Accordingly, we reverse in part and affirm in part the judgment of the trial court.

The jury…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. FlynnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. State v. CavalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. ForeshawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Friend v. GasparinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  2. State v. StephensonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  3. State v. LamantiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  4. State v. LamantiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API