Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wilkes v. Davies

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1894No. 900Published

Appeal from Superior Court, King Comity.

1DissentHoyt, J.

[dissenting).- — I am unable to agree with the conclusions of the majority as stated in the foregoing opinion, and, as I deem the questions discussed therein of great importance, shall at some length state the reasons which induce me to dissent therefrom.

Such conclusions are founded entirely upon the alleged fact that what was said by this court in the case of Wilkes v. Hunt was conclusive of the rights of the parties in the case at bar. If these conclusions had been put upon the ground that what was thus said had become a rule of decision for all cases presenting a similar state' of facts, I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aurora City v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Hawley v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Hammond's Lessee v. InloesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  4. Wilkes v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Dugan v. HollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API