Legal Opinion

In re O'Neil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, P. J.

The respondent was admitted to practice in the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in July, 1904.

He was general counsel of the Royal Indemnity Company and until October, 1922, he supervised the details of the legal department. Between that date and April, 1927, he retained the title of general counsel but did not supervise the legal details, being vice-president of the company, doing executive work. In April, 1927, he became its president.

The petition herein charges that while he was general counsel or president of the company, its agents or employees, acting pursuant to the instructions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of DolphinNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. In re IsaacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. In re SomervilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marco v. DullesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  2. In Re RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Reilley v. KeswaniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. In re ChartoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Brown v. University of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API