Legal Opinion

Dixon v. CITY NAT'L BK. OF METROPOLIS

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 7, 1979No. 79-87PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karns

Plaintiffs, Milledge and Irene Dixon, purchased certain real estate for $4,201 at an execution sale conducted to satisfy the judgment debt owed by Roy Moller, a joint owner of said property, to the City National Bank of Metropolis, the defendant. When the sale, and the deed issued in pursuance thereof, were subsequently voided in a previous appeal because of the sheriff’s failure to set off the judgment debtor’s *5,000 homestead exemption (Dixon v. Moller (1976), 42 Ill. App. 3d 688, 356 N.E.2d 599), plaintiffs filed an amended complaint to recover their purchase money which was paid to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bishop v. O'ConnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Hutson v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Dixon v. MollerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Martel v. BearceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  5. St. Louis & Sandoval Coal & Mining Co. v. Sandoval Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dixon v. City National Bank of MetropolisIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API