Legal Opinion
Vlt Corp. v. Lambda Electronics, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 3, 2003No. 1:01-cv-10957PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs VLT Corporation and Vicor Corporation (collectively “Vicor”) bring this patent infringement action against Lambda Electronics, Inc. (“Lambda”), claiming that Lambda’s power converters literally infringe Claims 1 and 5 of Vicor’s U.S. Patent No. Re. 36,098 (“the ’098 patent”). This complicated technology is examined in VLT Corp. v. Unitrode Corp., 130 F.Supp.2d 178 (D.Mass.2001) (“Unitrode ”), and the Memorandum and Order in VLT, Inc. v. Lucent Tech., Inc., 00-cv-11049-PBS (D.Mass. October 18, 2001) (“Lucent ”). Familiarity with these…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Inverness Medical Switzerland GMBH v. Acon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- VLT, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004