Legal Opinion
Radmanovich v. Combined Insurance Co. of America
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 26, 2003No. 01 C 9502PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Currently before the court is plaintiff Traci Radmanovich’s motion for class certification, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (“Rule 23”). For the following reasons, the court denies plaintiffs motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Traci Radmanovich (“Radmano-vich”) brings this suit on behalf of herself and a putative class, claiming that defendant Combined Insurance Company of America (“Combined”) discriminated against her and the potential class members, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Murray v. ETrade Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Smith v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Harris v. Comscore, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Fletcher v. ZLB Behring LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Radmanovich v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.