Legal Opinion
Murray v. ETrade Financial Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 20, 2006No. 05 C 5433PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Scott A. Murray sued defendants E*Trade Financial Corporation and E*Trade Bank (collectively, “E*Trade”) for accessing his consumer report in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. (2000). (R. 29, Am. Compl.1l 1.)1 Murray now moves for class certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Murray’s motion for class certification.
BACKGROUND
Murray alleges that in 2005 he received a document in the mail from E*Trade (hereinafter,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Rosario v. LivaditisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wahl v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Quiroz v. Revenue Production Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Taylor v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Cicilline v. Jewel Food Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Randolph v. Crown Asset Management, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.