Legal Opinion
Thornhill v. Skidmore
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFred J. Munder, J.
The plaintiffs are the owners of three lots designated as Lots Nos. 1, 2 and 3 in Block H as shown on a map *321entitled “ Map of Bayside Park, Part 2, Section 2 and Part I, Section 3,” which map was filed on August 5, 1932 as Map No. 1094 in the Suffolk County Clerk’s office.
The defendants Joseph J. Giuffre and Mary C. Giuffre are the owners of lots numbered 4, 5 and 6 on the same map, their lots being to the south of and abutting plaintiffs’ lots.
The pleadings herein indicate that the defendants George Skidmore and Velma Skidmore are the owners of a plot of land described in the complaint as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grafton v. . MoirNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Dalton v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Fiebelkorn v. RogackiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Fiebelkorn v. RogackiNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zanghi v. RificeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Red Boot Production Company, Inc., Barbara Landrum, Widow of Claude John Landrum, Eric Landrum, Matthew Wayne Landrum, Scott Michael Landrum, Dawn Ewing Mills, Tamara Ewing, Sean Ewing, Laura Ewing, J. Patrick Morris Sr., Joseph J. Morris v. Samson Exploration, LLC and SM Energy Company F/K/A St. Mary Land & Exploration Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2015