Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bailey v. Babcock

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 29, 1932No. Gen. No, 35,533Published

1DissentJustice Hatchett

The opinion of the majority of the court it seems to me disregards the well settled rules of law applicable to transactions of the kind here disclosed, disregards the fact that even on plaintiff’s theory of the case the issues, of fact were not fairly submitted to the jury, and then proceeds to decide the case upon a theory of law expressly disclaimed by plaintiff’s brief and upon an issue which was not before the trial court and which is not before this court upon the pleadings. It has been, supposed that the general rules of law applicable ■ to a transaction of this kind are well settled. I…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Markham v. . JaudonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Donald Friedman & Co. v. NewmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Banta v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Matzenbaugh v. People ex rel. GallowayIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API