Legal Opinion

McCullough's Petition

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 142PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaffer,

The question propounded to us on this appeal is: Proceeding under the Act of April 20, 1905, P. L. 239, providing the method of obtaining possession of property by purchasers at judicial sales: can a purchaser of property at partition sale obtain possession against a tenant, claiming under a lease, for a term of years antedating the decree in partition, made by the owners of a three-fourths’ interest therein?

It is true, we said, in Albert v. National Outfitting Co., 270 Pa. 183 (a proceeding under this act), “The possession of a tenant for years is paramount to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caveny v. CurtisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. McKinley ex rel. Orr v. PetersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Reed v. Fidelity Insurance Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  4. Albert v. National Outfitting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lichtenfels v. Bridgeview Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Bernstein v. ColletrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Lichtenfels v. Bridgeview Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Willis-Winchester Co., to Use v. ClaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Lewis, E. & J. v. Munda, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API