Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee and National Republican Congressional Committee v. Federal Election Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*403Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
At issue in this appeal is a Federal Election Commission regulation interpreting what political committees must do under the Federal Election Campaign Act to demonstrate that they have exercised their “best efforts” to encourage donors to disclose certain personally identifying information. For more than a decade, the Commission considered a political committee to have exercised “best efforts” if the committee made a clear request for the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Pursuing America's Greatness v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Williams v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. DeatonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. TrieDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Van Hollen v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.