Legal Opinion

Lynchburg Communications Systems, Inc. v. Ohio State Cellular Phone Co.

Virginia Circuit Court

Decided January 22, 2003No. Case No. CL02-624Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Charles N. Dorsey

This case was heard on September 26, 2002, on the motions, demurrers, and special pleas filed by the Defendants. Having considered the evidence and arguments presented, the court will sustain the Defendants’ demurrer as to defendants James Creekmore and Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, with leave to re-plead; overrule defendants’ demurrer under Federal Rule 60; and deny defendants’ motion objecting to venue.

Plaintiffs have alleged that Ohio State Cellular Phone Company, Inc. (OSC), Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove (WRH), and Mr. Creekmore (collectively Defendants) intentionally…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ivan N. Schatz Joann B. Schatz v. Mark E. Rosenberg Mer Enterprises, Incorporated Stephen Jaeger Weinberg & GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. Simmons v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  3. Mortarino v. Consultant Engineering Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  4. Delk v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  5. Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API