Legal Opinion

Roberts v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 3, 1933No. 785PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

On April 9, 1932, the plaintiff filed this action on a war risk insurance policy, alleging that the policy matured on January 11, 1919, by virtue' of his total and permanent disability arising on that date. The trial court sustained a demurrer on the ground that the cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations. The statute provides:

“No suit on yearly renewal term insurance shall be allowed under this section unless the same shall have been' brought within six years after the right accrued for which the claim is made or within one year after July 3, 1930;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1932
  2. Carson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1930
  3. Hunnewell v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Chicago Golf ClubCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  2. Weaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  3. Lynch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  4. Tyson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  5. Baille v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API