Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Alabama Home Mortgage Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 28, 2002No. 1001794PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

Maple Chase Company (“MCC”) petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its order requiring MCC to reimburse Keith Dickerson for the costs his counsel incurred in traveling to MCC’s principal place of business in Downersgrove, Illinois, and MCC’s production facility in Chihuahua, Mexico, to inspect and copy documents Dickerson requested from MCC, as well as costs incurred for translating the documents located at MCC’s Mexico facility from Spanish to English. We grant the petition and issue the writ.

Facts and Procedural History

Dickerson sued…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Ex Parte Alfab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Assured Inv'rs Life Ins. Co. v. Nat. U. Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Ex Parte HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte Maple Chase Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API