Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Maple Chase Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 28, 2002No. 1001794PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
840 So.2d 147 (2002)
Ex parte MAPLE CHASE COMPANY.
(In re Keith Dickerson v. Alabama Home Mortgage Company, Inc., and Maple Chase Company).
1001794.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
June 28, 2002.
James E. Davis, Jr., and Jeffrey T. Kelly of Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne, P.C., Huntsville, for petitioner.
Glenda G. Cochran of Cochran & Associates, Birmingham, for respondent.
BROWN, Justice.
Maple Chase Company ("MCC") petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its order requiring MCC to reimburse Keith Dickerson for the costs his counsel incurred in traveling to MCC's…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Ex Parte Alfab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Assured Inv'rs Life Ins. Co. v. Nat. U. Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Ex Parte HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zaden v. ElkusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- W.R. Huff Asset Management Co. v. Kohlberg, Kravis, Roberts & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Sessoms v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024