Asher v. Unarco Material Handling, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.
This case presents an interesting choice of law question — whose law should the Court apply when the forum state (Kentucky) has minimal interests and the competing state (Illinois) does not have much of an interest either. While at first blush, this appears to be a difficult question, if Kentucky’s presumption for its own law means anything, it means that a court must apply Kentucky’s law when there are not overwhelming interests to the contrary.
Background
This story begins in 2005. At that time, Atlas, an Illinois corporation, sold…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wallace Hardware Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Bill Abrams, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- American Bumper and Manufacturing Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- True v. RainesKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Breeding v. Massachusetts Indemnity & Life Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Wells Fargo Financial Leasing, Inc. v. GriffinDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Acuity Brands, Inc. v. BickleyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2016
- Geico Indemnity Co. v. CrawfordDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
- American Towers LLC v. BPI, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015
- Asher v. Unarco Material Handling, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.