Legal Opinion
United States v. Seay
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided December 19, 1974No. Crim. 74-57-EPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FOREMAN, District Judge:
Defendant has waived trial by jury with the consent of the Government pursuant to Rule 23(a), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. This matter comes before the Court upon a stipulated statement of facts. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the indictment and a motion for judgment of acquittal. The indictment charges him with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2314 in that he caused to pass in interstate commerce a forged check payable to the order of John Seay in the amount of $1883. drawn upon the Southern Illinois National Bank and signed with the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Pines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Greathouse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Michael C. Jackson, United States of America v. Salvatore (Sam) PellitieriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. N. John Fontana, IICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Robert Everett Huntley and Gipson F. HemphillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. John G. SeayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. N. John Fontana, IICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991