Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 1, 1983No. 82-79PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

Arthur Brennan Malloy appeals pro se from the denial of his motion brought pursuant to Alabama Rules of Civil ^Procedure, Rule 60(b), for relief from a summary judgment entered against him as plaintiff in a malpractice action against an attorney. That summary judgment was reviewed and affirmed by this Court in Malloy v. Sulli*515van, 415 So.2d 1059 (Ala.1982), and the facts underlying that action are set out therein.

Appellant cannot review the correctness of that judgment in a 60(b) motion; the only issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Daphne v. CaffeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Malloy v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Malloy v. SullivanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Hobbs v. HeiseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Phillips v. AlonzoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API