Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Nicholas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1963No. 40134PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of Tulsa County, Oklahoma, sustaining, motions for a new trial in two zoning cases consolidated for the purpose of trial and likewise for appeal.

The defendants in error, Nicholas and wife, are the owners of Lots 16 and 17 in Block 1, Sheridan Heights Addition to the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Richards and McGill are the owners of Lot 18, Block 5, Sheridan Heights Addition to the City of Tulsa. Nicholas is a physician and seeks to enjoin the city from enforcing a zoning ordinance which prohibits him from using his property…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hillcrest Medical Center v. WierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Horn v. SturmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. City of Tulsa v. NicholasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Elmore v. McQuestionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Griffith Realty Co. v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. City of Ada v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API