Legal Opinion
Schmoldt v. Oakley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 17, 1964No. 40367PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Justice.
In 1961 plaintiff sold a new Pontiac automobile to Hans Schmoldt, defendant, delivering with it a warranty covering the first 12,000 miles that the car was driven. There was a transmission failure after the car had been driven approximately 30,000 miles which resulted in expense of $561.00 for repair thereof for which sum defendant made claim to plaintiff, exhibiting him a letter which he prepared to send the Pontiac Division of General Motors Corporation, and unless his claim was honored satisfactorily to him, he would make it known generally in the community that he had been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. . ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- American Malting Co. v. KeitelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Dailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Marx & Haas Jeans Clothing Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
- Carter v. Knapp Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Steven M. Kramer v. Richard ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Sid Dillon Chevrolet-Oldsmobile-Pontiac, Inc. v. SullivanNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Anderson v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- First American Bank & Trust Co. v. SawyerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Pittman v. Cohn Communities, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.