Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. Robert C. Van Laanen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 7, 1985No. 85-1050PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a), Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore submitted without oral argument.

The issue in this case is whether the district court erred in holding that the defendant was estopped from denying liability in an action by the FDIC to collect on an assumption agreement.

The FDIC, as receiver for the Penn Square Bank, seeks to collect $35,000 from the defendant based on an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Gattuso v. PecorellaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. John L. Clark v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ron Grubb v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. Castleglen, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. Castleglen, Inc. v. Commonwealth Savings Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1989
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. MM & S PARTNERSDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Adams v. Madison Realty & Development, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API