Legal Opinion · Dissent

Central States Electric Co. v. City of Muscatine

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 12, 1945No. 85Published

1DissentJustice Black

The primary purpose of Congress in passing the Natural Gas Act was to protect ultimate consumers of gas from excessive prices. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U. S. 591, 610, 612. The Court’s decision today defeats that Congressional purpose, for under its interpretation of the Act the petitioner, a retail gas distributor, is awarded a windfall,1 at the expense of the very consumers the Act was designed to protect.

On September 23, 1938, a petition praying for reduction of the wholesale gas rates of the Natural Gas Pipeline Company was filed with the Federal Power…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Public Util. Comm'n of Ohio v. United Fuel Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API