Legal Opinion

People v. Conrad

New York County Courts

Decided December 2, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hyman T. Maas, J.

The issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court’s negligence in scheduling a jury trial is a basis to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to grant defendant a speedy trial under CPL 30.30.

CPL 30.30 (subd 1) explicitly states that a motion to dismiss "must be granted where the people are not ready for trial”. The negligence of the trial court cannot be imputed to the People or prosecutor. The trial court is not "the people” referred to in the statute.

*656The clear legislative intent in CPL 30.30 was to compel the prosecutor to prepare to try his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. People v. LehrerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
  3. People v. RodriguezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1986
  4. People v. WaltonNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API