Legal Opinion
Doyle Group v. Alaskans for Cuddy
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 8, 2013No. AC 34618PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
In this breach of contract action, the defendants, Alaskans for Cuddy and David Cuddy, appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, The Doyle Group, Inc. The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) asserted personal jurisdiction over Cuddy, (2) denied their motion for a directed verdict, *343and (3) denied their motion to set aside the verdict. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts as reasonably could have been found by the jury are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiff is a Connecticut…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Dills v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Zartolas v. NisenfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Packer v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- TD Bank, N.A. v. SalceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Doyle Group v. Alaskans for CuddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Lee v. GolaszewskiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Lyons v. Birmingham Law Office, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- Needle v. True North Equity, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.