Arvie v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Dan Arvie allegedly sustained injuries while working a seaman for Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. Arvie sued Diamond for negligence and unseaworthiness under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30104, and for maintenance and cure. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Diamond on all counts, and Arvie appealed without counsel. In a brief to this court, an appellant’s argument section must contain the “appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies.” Fed. R.App. P. 28(a)(9)(A); see Moore v. FDIC, 993…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Downey v. StrainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Kelley v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Briar Capital Working Fund v. RemmertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2026