Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Perkins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 15, 1985No. F-83-213Published

1Concurrence

PARKS, Presiding Judge,

specially concurring:

While I agree with the outcome of this case, I want to comment on the use of transcripts from preliminary hearings at trial when the witness is no longer available to testify.

*1369In the case at bar, Appellant argued that the trial court erred in not allowing him to object during the reading of Officer El-ledge’s preliminary hearing testimony as it was presented to the jury during trial. At one point, the defense attorney attempted to enter an objection to a question, and the trial court said it would not entertain any objections during the reading of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Morrison v. LoweSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. McCurdy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Beaird v. RameyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. State v. FredetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API