Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 23, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OLIVER, Judge.

Represented by appointed counsel, Russell and Sweeney were tried simultaneously and convicted upon four separate presentments, one charging Russell with escape from jail while confined on a felony charge, one charging Sweeney with escape from jail under like circumstances, one charging them jointly with the armed robbery of Charles Pope, and the other charging them jointly with taking and using Pope’s pick-up truck temporarily without his consent in violation of the joy-riding statute (TCA § 59-504). Each of the defendants was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Nance v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Dowdy v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Arterburn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Patmore v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Smith v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boswell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  2. State v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API