Legal Opinion

Patmore v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1925PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This is an appeal from a conviction under indictment with two counts charging (1) possession of a still, or a part thereof, used or intended to be used for the manufacture of whisky; and (2) the unlawful manufacture of whisky. On the facts of the case it is insisted that all of the evidence for th¿ State was that of accomplices. We have carefully examined the record and are satisfied that the rule requiring corroboration of the testimony of accomplices has not been violated. The- testimony of the arresting officer, together with that of the two alleged accomplices, is quite satisfactorily…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stevens v. McClaughryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  2. Cronan v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Johnson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  4. Davis v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. DentonTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hardin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Ritter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  5. Dowdy v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API