Legal Opinion

Bolden v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 28, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-72656PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GUBOW, District Judge.

The court has before it defendant John Hancock’s motion for partial summary judgment as to counts two and three of plaintiff’s complaint.

This is a diversity action in which plaintiff sues his insurer for disability benefits under the insurer’s group policy issued to Ford Motor Company, plaintiff’s former employer. The three counts of the complaint respectively allege breach of contract, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff seeks ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) for the breach of contract claim and two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Dr. Finn F. L'Orange v. The Medical Protective CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  4. Frishett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Eugene Cole and Mary Cole, His Wife v. Thomas A. Cardoza, District Director, United States, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Roberts v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Drouillard v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Hendricks v. DSW Shoe Warehouse Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API