Legal Opinion
Forster v. SAIF Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 15, 1998No. Civil 97-1296-JOPublished
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.
Based upon the record,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this case is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff Steven Forster brings this action against his former employer, defendant State Accident Insurance Fund Corporation (“SAIF”), under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”), 38 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq. Plaintiff alleges that from 1986 to 1996, while employed by SAIF, his active membership in the Oregon National Guard occasionally required absence from work. According to plaintiff, these…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Nelson v. City of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Duffy v. RivelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.