Legal Opinion

Wood v. Riverside General Hospital

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 11, 1994No. G013623PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, J. *

Thomas Wood commenced this action on May 10, 1989. Respondent Riverside County answered and eventually was granted summary judgment predicated upon the failure of Wood to present a claim for damages before filing the action as required by Government Code section 911.2. Wood argues that a “Patient Problem/Complaint Form” submitted to the hospital’s quality assurance department on June 20, 1988, together with a “Supplemental Note” dated June 29, both complaining about the quality of his care constituted substantial compliance with the claims statute. We disagree.

Following…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Phillips v. Desert Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Koehrer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Hejmadi v. Amfac, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Briggs v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Del Real v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Janis v. California State Lottery CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Ovando v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Holmes v. California National GuardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API