Legal Opinion

Baggett Transportation Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 31, 1991No. Nos. 467-89C, 468-89C, 575-89C, 469-89C and 471-89CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

These consolidated contract cases are before the court on the plaintiffs’ motions for partial summary judgment and the defendant’s cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff common carriers, trucking companies, contracted with the defendant, the United States, to transport military shipments. The plaintiffs claim entitlement to additional charges for alleged “exclusive use” service provided to the defendant on two grounds. For some shipments, the plaintiffs contend that notations on government bills of lading (“GBLs”) requiring “prior consent” for removal of seals…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. George Hyman Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Fort Vancouver Plywood Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Alcoa Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Campbell "66" Express, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A-Transport Northwest Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Nicholson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Baggett Transportation Co., and Coast Counties Express, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Central Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. A-Transport Northwest Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API